Re: No etags?

From: "Colin 't Hart" <colin(at)sharpheart(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No etags?
Date: 2013-06-11 11:09:48
Message-ID: CAMon-aRawUS-6PrG=EZLGVu1QrZ+tuQG3uewkYqzbuR3bpqy7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-debian

It seems to be working, the acid test will be when 9.3b2 comes out.
Right now there haven't been any updates for a month now, I hope
that's correct :-)

On 11 June 2013 12:46, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Colin 't Hart <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When I run "apt-get update" I note that all other repositories are
>>> just "Hit" whereas the PG repository is always gotten ("Get"). Firing
>>> up Firebug I note that no Etags are sent.
>>>
>>> Just thought I'd report this.
>>
>> Interesting - thanks for reporting that. I'll put it on my list and
>> look into it!
>
> Hi!
>
> This should be properly fixed now. There was some time with a partial
> fix as well if you ran into that - where each of the different
> frontends would generate a *different* etag, so you'd get different
> results if it switched frontend. But they should now be consistent
> across all of them.
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-pkg-debian by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-06-13 17:27:43 postgresql-server 9.3
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-06-11 10:46:09 Re: No etags?