Re: Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code
Date: 2017-04-19 01:48:45
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zmu_gFJ5rfg+0=oUDv6f7Am_gp64_GTOVaEpgrAFEojg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 18 April 2017 at 13:12, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Yeh, this is better. Pushed.
> >
> > I have been outraced on this one, the error is obvious once you see it ;)
>
> Didn't realise you were working on it, nothing competitive about it.
>
> It's clear this needed fixing, whether or not it fixes Jeff's report.
>
> I do think it explains the report, so I'm hopeful.
>

The git HEAD code (c727f12) has been surviving so far, with both test cases.

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-04-19 02:09:00 Re: Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code
Previous Message Douglas Doole 2017-04-19 00:39:48 [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery