From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Giorgio Saviane <gsaviane(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17449: Disk space not released |
Date: | 2022-05-30 16:36:05 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1zJeNmHL=p3iYq64HTn9TuhmZuGB+EmVf7f7D5qPTjL2Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, May 30, 2022, 7:40 AM Giorgio Saviane <gsaviane(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Despite any attempt
> >>> > of full vacuum the discrepancy remained the same. I suspect that
> Postgres
> >>> > started leaking disk space. I could see many 1Gb files with a
> timestamp of
> >>> > two months back in time in the postgres data folder.
> >
> >
> > If the database suffers a crash (or immediate shutdown) in the middle of
> something like VACUUM FULL or CLUSTER, it might leave orphaned in-process
> files such as the ones you describe behind and have no way to know to clean
> them up. The knowledge about what it was working on just before the crash
> was lost in the crash.
> >
> > Files not touched in 2 months and also not referenced in
> pg_class.relfilenode are almost certainly such orphaned files and could,
> with extreme nervousness, be cleaned up by hand. Especially if the
> human-readable log files support a crash having happened at that time.
>
> That was not the case. The server has been running seamlessly since I
> rebuilt the master.
>
But as i understand it, you rebuilt the master as a response to the
problem, so the time period in question is before the rebuild, not after.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2022-05-30 17:53:33 | Re: psql 15beta1 does not print notices on the console until transaction completes |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2022-05-30 15:18:28 | Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error |