| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unarchived WALs deleted after crash |
| Date: | 2013-02-21 17:18:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1zERLC-kNFgU7dbe2pE9p_f3nHWPnO7_Pp=v9b22LbBQw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Are you talking about the patch to avoid restored WAL segments from being
> re-archived (commit 6f4b8a4f4f7a2d683ff79ab59d3693714b965e3d), or the bug
> that that unarchived WALs were deleted after crash (commit
> b5ec56f664fa20d80fe752de494ec96362eff520)? The former was included in 9.2.0
> already, and the latter will be included in the next point release.
>
...
>
> I don't know what the release schedule is. I take that to be a request to
> put out a new minor release ASAP.
+1 from me. I'm rather uncomfortable running a system with this
unarchived deletion bug.
Cheers,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-21 17:25:37 | Re: sql_drop Event Trigger |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-02-21 17:16:10 | Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender |