From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |
Date: | 2014-01-16 18:14:33 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1zCsR8FV=p5w2pms5UK5wXKbRDBu7Zc7GwPESk1B3MXTQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > I think the usecases that would want this for DML probably also wan this
> > to work for unlogged, temp tables.
>
> Huh? Unlogged tables generate *zero* WAL, by definition.
>
Transactions that only change unlogged tables still generate commit records
to WAL.
I don't think that amount of WAL is particularly relevant to this
discussion, but I was recently surprised by it, so wanted to publicize it.
(It was causing a lot of churn in my WAL due to interaction with
archive_timeout)
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-01-16 18:18:05 | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |
Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2014-01-16 18:10:38 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |