| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Indexes for hashes |
| Date: | 2016-06-15 15:14:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1z9XEOwD6EaqzBhtJYbLed3Qbtxx2nVP7y-35CHWkrU7Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:16 AM, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:09:04PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> On 15 June 2016 at 15:03, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't suppose there's an effort in progress to make hash indexes use WAL?
>> :D
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Several people have looked at it but it has not made it to the top of anyone's
> to-do list.
I don't know if it is the top of his todo list, but Amit seems pretty
serious about it:
I hope to give him some help if I get a chance.
Cheers,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Myers | 2016-06-15 22:00:06 | pg_restore seems very slow |
| Previous Message | ktm@rice.edu | 2016-06-15 14:53:44 | Re: Indexes for hashes |