From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kiran <bangalore(dot)kiran(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Index scan is not working |
Date: | 2016-09-19 16:55:15 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1z0mpvGgZrtcmnnE3Act_0Vou6d8y2CobrNCR+1K1YGXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Kiran <bangalore(dot)kiran(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a table called question which has a ts_vector column *weighted_tsv*
> .
> I have gin indexed the weighted_tsv column.
>
> When I query using the following
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from question where weighted_tsv @@
> to_tsquery('Hur&ofta');
>
> I get the following output
>
> "Bitmap Heap Scan on question (cost=12.33..25.38 rows=10 width=731)
> (actual time=0.058..0.062 rows=3 loops=1)"
> " Recheck Cond: (weighted_tsv @@ to_tsquery('Hur&ofta'::text))"
> " Heap Blocks: exact=3"
> " -> Bitmap Index Scan on weighted_tsv_question_idx (cost=0.00..12.33
> rows=10 width=0) (actual time=0.052..0.052 rows=3 loops=1)"
> " Index Cond: (weighted_tsv @@ to_tsquery('Hur&ofta'::text))"
> "Planning time: 0.205 ms"
> "Execution time: 0.104 ms"
>
>
> Why the query is using the Bitmap ? Not the Index scan ?
>
Gin indexes do not support non-bitmap index scans, only bitmap index scans.
> Also to_tsquery is casting to ::text. Is this normal ?
>
Yes.
It is pointless to test performance against a table with 10 rows. If your
table will soon have a few thousand rows, then either wait until it does,
or create a test server and fabricate a few thousand rows worth of test
data.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Jungwirth | 2016-09-19 18:05:45 | Re: journaling / time travel |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-09-19 16:41:33 | Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains |