Re: postgres 9.2

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pg noob <pgnube(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres 9.2
Date: 2013-08-28 16:11:34
Message-ID: CAMkU=1z-auXDCU34gxzKv=KuGMBp9zpsC0Jg2f+LxfOFA9dWNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:26 PM, pg noob <pgnube(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently ran a couple of tests where I took one of my production
> systems and did a drop-in replacement of postgres 8.4 with 9.2.4.
> I was expecting to see some performance improvement given the release
> notes describing 9.2 as a "largely performance related release".
>
> At least for my application, which is an embedded postgresql install
> with a relatively small number of client connections, I'm not seeing much
> of a measurable difference at all.

There were a bunch of different, specific, performance improvements
each with a focused area. Many of them related to reducing contention
in many-CPU systems. If your system wasn't having problems in the
specific areas that were improved, you wouldn't see an improvement.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Filip Rembiałkowski 2013-08-28 18:26:59 9.0 hot standby, consistent recovery state question
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2013-08-28 15:38:03 Re: postgres 9.2