From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql UPDATE field [tab] expands to DEFAULT? |
Date: | 2019-06-18 00:34:33 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1yycATjA4Ti7d=t8i9HV-3iN9iC8yQpBsZANc+-GUxn8w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:23 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 6/17/19 4:33 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Adrian, though I wasn't really seeking tips for column names. I
> > was instead trying to understand whether this particular tab expansion
> > was intentional and considered useful, and if so what that usefulness
>
> If I am following the below correctly it is intentional:
>
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c;h=68a2ba27aec22302625c5481a8f74cf866f4dc23;hb=d22ca701a39dfd03cdfa1ca238370d34f4bc4ac4
>
> Line 2888
>
But that portion doesn't offer the DEFAULT completion. It stops at
offering '=', and goes no further.
It is at line 2859 which accidentally offers to complete DEFAULT, and that
is not part of the UPDATE-specific code.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-06-18 00:39:21 | Re: psql UPDATE field [tab] expands to DEFAULT? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2019-06-18 00:29:54 | Re: Inserts restricted to a trigger |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-06-18 00:39:21 | Re: psql UPDATE field [tab] expands to DEFAULT? |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-06-18 00:23:47 | Re: psql UPDATE field [tab] expands to DEFAULT? |