From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: High-CPU consumption on information_schema (only) query |
Date: | 2016-09-08 23:36:59 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1ynPaPxL3TcoWQxub25SuQ9MyYLY_BazYYegv3HsxXj1g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> An SQL (with only information_schema related JOINS) when triggered, runs
with max CPU (and never ends - killed after 2 days).
> - It runs similarly (very slow) on a replicated server that acts as a
read-only slave.
> - Top shows only postgres as hitting max CPU (nothing else). When query
killed, CPU near 0%.
> - When the DB is restored on a separate test server (with the exact
postgresql.conf) the same query works fine.
> - There is no concurrent usage on the replicated / test server (although
the primary is a Production server and has concurrent users).
>
> Questions:
> - If this was a postgres bug or a configuration issue, query on the
restored DB should have been slow too. Is there something very basic I am
missing here?
>
> If someone asks for I could provide SQL + EXPLAIN, but it feels
irrelevant here. I amn't looking for a specific solution but what else
should I be looking for here?
strace -ttt -T -y the process to see what system calls it is making. If it
is not doing many systme calls, or they are uninformative, then attach the
gdb debugger to it and periodically interrupt the process (ctrl c) and take
a back trace (bt), then restart it (c) and repeat. If all the stack traces
look similar, you will know where the time is going.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-08 23:39:40 | Re: High-CPU consumption on information_schema (only) query |
Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2016-09-08 23:06:59 | Re: Let file_fdw access COPY FROM PROGRAM |