From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nandakumar M <m(dot)nanda92(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performa(dot)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query is slow when run for first time; subsequent execution is fast |
Date: | 2018-01-10 19:34:17 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1yiULP9Gdy1pT2bpVomi4cinNGz8d7-7y+chBOQFg3f6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Nandakumar M <m(dot)nanda92(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am not using prepared statements. Postgres documentation and previous
> questions in the pgsql-performance mailing list mention that the query plan
> is cached only when prepared statements are used.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/15600.1346885470%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> In the above thread Tom Lane mentions that the plan is never cached for
> raw queries. Yet, this is exactly what seems to be happening in my case. Am
> I missing something?
>
The query plan itself is not cached, but all the metadata about the (large
number) of tables used in the query is cached. Apparently reading/parsing
that data is the slow step, not coming up with the actual plan.
> Please let me know how I can make sure the query execution for the first
time is fast too.
Don't keep closing and reopening connections. Use a connection pooler
(pgbouncer, pgpool, whatever pooler is built into your
language/library/driver, etc.) if necessary to accomplish this.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | POUSSEL, Guillaume | 2018-01-11 08:19:39 | Slow queries after Windows startup |
Previous Message | ghiureai | 2018-01-10 18:49:41 | Re: PG 9.5 2 tables same DDL with diff size |