On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:42 AM Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Vacuum is overkill (and can be extremely slow to run a large gin index),
>> you just need to get it to autoanalyze by changing the per-table setting of
>> "autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor" to zero and instead using
>>
>
> Did you mean autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor or does it not matter?
>
Yes, sorry. Those long names make my eyes go bleary.
Cheers,
Jeff