From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AS OF queries |
Date: | 2017-12-26 21:52:36 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1yUHdLb2T9P6j+bFOrnzB1QAQ0b0E-c+b2U57Mvd2_DRA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik <
k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> There is still one significant difference of my prototype implementation
> with SQL standard: it associates timestamp with select statement, not with
> particular table.
> It seems to be more difficult to support and I am not sure that joining
> tables from different timelines has much sense.
> But certainly it also can be fixed.
I think the main use I would find for this feature is something like:
select * from foo except select * from foo as old_foo as of '<some time>';
So I would be grateful if you can make that work. Also, I think conforming
to the standards is pretty important where it is feasible to do that.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-12-26 22:26:58 | Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-26 20:53:38 | Re: [HACKERS] LDAPS |