Re: Runtime variations during day

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Carlos Henrique Reimer <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Runtime variations during day
Date: 2013-02-13 23:31:32
Message-ID: CAMkU=1y8uP-ZES4Zn=OW4ME6zcLgHDGqAkNrRtPTVH+cM-xaxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Carlos Henrique Reimer <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
>> Will include the EXPLAIN ANALYZE again here:
>
>> -> Index Scan using pagpk_aux_mes, pagpk_aux_mes, pk_cadpag, pk_cadpag,
>> pk_cadpag, pagchavefunc00 on cadpag (cost=0.00..131521.88 rows=183322
>> width=62) (actual time=0.664..614.080 rows=32828 loops=1)
>
> BTW, I just noticed this multiple-index annotation, which means that
> either you're not using a community version of Postgres or else it's
> 8.0 or older (8.1 replaced that plan type with bitmap index scans).

I was curious about that string, never haven seen anything like it before.

That also explains why disable_cost is 1e8 rather than 1e10 (commit
b24c02ff2c2a6) in the later query/explains he posted.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey Jones 2013-02-14 00:06:42 Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken?
Previous Message Sergey Konoplev 2013-02-13 23:24:18 Re: Join query query