On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Elanchezhiyan Elango <elanelango(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:
> Missed to answer this one:
>
>> Is the 5GB for the table plus indexes, or just the table itself?
>
> No it's not including the the indices. Including indices it's actually
> 17GB!!
>
Is it one particular index that is bloated?
Cheers,
Jeff