Re: Vacuuming strategy

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Elanchezhiyan Elango <elanelango(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuuming strategy
Date: 2014-05-02 19:16:15
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xv0z=j5CYBsyb1xvRkKRnx3WstGjF2soAuaQ1Lh5DXaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Elanchezhiyan Elango <elanelango(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:

> Missed to answer this one:
>
>> Is the 5GB for the table plus indexes, or just the table itself?
>
> No it's not including the the indices. Including indices it's actually
> 17GB!!
>

Is it one particular index that is bloated?

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2014-05-02 19:21:36 Re: Manipulating jsonb
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-05-02 19:13:02 Re: Vacuuming strategy