From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench progress with timestamp |
Date: | 2015-09-07 19:15:28 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1xrSO6S-E-6=Rgnux0iwL=LuCNsXLub4fLcYThB4Z9A1Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>
> It is not easy to compare events on a pgbench runs (oops, the tps is down)
> with for instance events in postgres log, so as to figure out what may have
> cause a given glitch.
>
> This patches adds an option to replace the "time since pgbench run
> started" with a timestamp in the progress report so that it is easier to
> compare timelines.
>
> Use milliseconds for consistency with the '%n' log_prefix patch currently
> submitted by Tomas Vondra in the CF.
>
> sh> ./pgbench -P 1 -N -T 100 -c 2
> starting vacuum...end.
> progress: 1.0 s, 546.0 tps, lat 3.619 ms stddev 4.426
> progress: 2.0 s, 575.0 tps, lat 3.480 ms stddev 1.705
>
> sh> ./pgbench -P 1 --progress-timestamp -N -T 100 -c 2
> starting vacuum...end.
> progress: 1440328800.064 s, 549.0 tps, lat 3.602 ms stddev 1.698
> progress: 1440328801.064 s, 570.0 tps, lat 3.501 ms stddev 1.704
>
I like the idea of the timestamp. But could just always print both the
timestamp and the elapsed time, rather than adding another switch to decide
between them?
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-09-07 19:24:27 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-07 19:09:27 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |