From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Sahagian, David" <david(dot)sahagian(at)emc(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: changes "during checkpointing" |
Date: | 2013-01-12 21:02:27 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1xpO9HV=vhCqAsVQi3boh3E_4=ESj7qNW7_7phws4kH6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Sahagian, David <david(dot)sahagian(at)emc(dot)com> wrote:
> In regards to 9.1.x, I would like to learn some details of the nature of
> “checkpointing”
>
> === Question 1 ===
>
> - page 123 is dirty
>
> - "checkpointing" starts
>
> - page 123 gets written to disk, as part of this checkpoint
>
> - page 123 gets modified again
>
> ? Does it get written to disk again, as part of this checkpoint?
No, the checkpointer doesn't write it again.
>
> === Question 2 ===
>
> - page 123 is dirty
>
> - "checkpointing" starts
>
> - page 123 gets modified again
>
> - page 123 gets written to disk, as part of this checkpoint
>
> ? So does the most recent mod get written to disk, even if that mod is not
> committed yet ?
Yes, it the most recent version that gets written. The notion of
"committed' does not really apply to pages.
> === Question 3 ===
>
>
>
> When does the full-page-writing to WAL happen ?
>
> Is it after the start of the "checkpointing" or after the finish of the
> "checkpointing" ?
>
The start.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rhys A.D. Stewart | 2013-01-12 22:10:12 | syntax error in a trigger. can't find it. |
Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2013-01-12 14:34:04 | Re: reducing number of ANDs speeds up query |