From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Where to load modules from? |
Date: | 2013-09-15 21:52:48 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1xdGa+ppAqR_6ii9ypcKnBXDbv6-_uCSMcJ4Pc+EfWkVA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 22:15 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> >
> > This proposal comes with no patch because I think we are able to
> > understand it without that, so that it would only be a waste of
> > everybody's time to attach code for a random solution on the list here
> > to that email.
>
> It shouldn't be in the commit fest if it has no patch.
>
>
I thought the general recommendation was the opposite, that planning and
road maps should be submitted for review before non-trivial coding is
started; and that despite the name the commitfest is the best way that this
is done. Of course now I can't find the hackers thread where this
recommendation was made...
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2013-09-15 22:13:26 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2013-09-15 21:23:32 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |