On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:52 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Reading over this code, I noticed that the detection of the catch-up
> state ends up being duplicate code, so I would rework that function as
> in the attached patch.
>
> The naming of those flags (got_SIGUSR2, got_STOPPING) is terrible, but
> I'm not going to change that in a backpatchable bug fix.
>
Hi Alvaro, does this count as a review? And Craig, do you agree with
Alvaro's patch as a replacement for your own?
Thanks,
Jeff