Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
> >> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
> >
> > okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
> >
>
> Thanks, this version looks good to me.
>

It solves the problem for me. I'd like to test that I get the right answer
on the standby, not just the absence of a crash, but I don't know how to do
that effectively. Has anyone used the new wal replay block consistency
tool on hash indexes since this microvacuum code was committed?

Jeff