Re: Cache Hash Index meta page.

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Cache Hash Index meta page.
Date: 2016-09-26 20:23:03
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xPXef9seraNjcs+xXqBpivEO=9DYhTip6FORk6up6q9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Jesper Pedersen <
> jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > For the archives, this patch conflicts with the WAL patch [1].
>>
>> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JS%2BSiRSQBzEFp
>> nsSmxZKingrRH7WNyWULJeEJSj1-%3D0w%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>
> Updated the patch it applies over Amit's concurrent hash index[1] and
> Amit's wal for hash index patch[2] together.
>

I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5 of
wal

Thanks,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-09-26 20:43:31 Re: Add support for restrictive RLS policies
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-09-26 20:22:33 Re: pageinspect: Hash index support