From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | levertond(at)googlemail(dot)com |
Cc: | Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8273: Assertion failure in 9.3 beta2 with serializable and savepoints |
Date: | 2013-07-01 18:49:30 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1xLAk7tCyd=ZRHiMF=T4iZY5xO6Gy-2Mmv5=9NzSrvkcA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:43 AM, <levertond(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 8273
> Logged by: David Leverton
> Email address: levertond(at)googlemail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
> Operating system: RHEL 5 x86_64
> Description:
>
> The following test case causes a backend assertion failure in 9.3 beta2:
>
>
> START TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
> CREATE TABLE testing(
> x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY
> );
> INSERT INTO testing VALUES(1);
> SELECT * FROM testing WHERE x = 1 FOR UPDATE;
> SAVEPOINT test;
> UPDATE testing SET x = 2 WHERE x = 1;
> ROLLBACK TO test;
> UPDATE testing SET x = 3 WHERE x = 1;
> ROLLBACK;
>
>
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(((xid) != ((TransactionId) 0)))", File:
> "predicate.c", Line: 3936)
>
>
> Postgres was installed using the RPMs from http://yum.pgrpms.org/, and is
> using a near-default configuration (changes to port number, data directory
> and pg_hba.conf, and some roles created, but nothing likely to influence
> this bug).
>
I can confirm this compiling from source on CentOS 6.4.
The bug was introduced in commit: 0ac5ad5... Improve concurrency of foreign
key locking.
I don't know what more to look into on this, so I'm cc Alvaro, the patch
author.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-01 18:51:20 | Re: BUG #8273: Assertion failure in 9.3 beta2 with serializable and savepoints |
Previous Message | Eyal Kaspi | 2013-07-01 18:05:06 | Re: BUG #8269: the recovery_target_inclusive is always considered as false |