Re: safer node casting

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: safer node casting
Date: 2017-02-21 22:49:57
Message-ID: CAMkU=1x63f2QyFTeas83xJqD+Hm1PBuok1LrzYzS-OngDzYOVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 1/26/17 16:15, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2017-01-25 19:21:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> >>> On 2016-12-31 12:08:22 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>>> RestrictInfo *rinfo = castNode(RestrictInfo, lfirst(lc));
> >>
> >>> Are you planning to add this / update this patch? Because I really
> would
> >>> have liked this a number of times already... I can update it according
> >>> to my suggestions (to avoid multiple eval scenarios) if helpful
> >>
> >> Yeah, I'd like that in sooner rather than later, too. But we do need
> >> it to be foolproof - no multiple evals. The first draft had
> >> inadequate-parenthesization hazards,
> >
> > How about something like the attached? The first patch just contains
> > castNode(), the second one a rebased version of Peter's changes (with
> > some long lines broken up).
>
> Thanks for finishing that up. I have committed more uses that I had
> lying around partially done. Looks nice now.
>
>
With commit 38d103763d14baddf3cbfe4b00b501059fc9447f, I'm now getting a
compiler warning:

indxpath.c: In function 'generate_bitmap_or_paths':
indxpath.c:1312: warning: unused variable 'rinfo'

I have: gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-17) (GCC)

No arguments to ./configure are needed.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Cloos 2017-02-21 22:52:10 Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-02-21 22:40:41 Json support for array pseudotypes