On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:48 AM, ascot(dot)moss(at)gmail(dot)com
<ascot(dot)moss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> how about the case as follows?
>
> idx_scan = 0 and idx_tup_read = 0 and idx_tup_fetch = 0, but
> idx_blks_read is not 0 and idx_blks_hit is not 0
> ?
Maintaining an unused index still requires its blocks to be read.
Cheers,
Jeff