Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?

From: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?
Date: 2016-04-26 01:48:44
Message-ID: CAMjNa7f9ddUQABS1-4_7XFqH_dHz_L32fyR1Kfkgw50kA_WL8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>It is not difficult to simulate column store in a row store system if
>you're willing to decompose your tables into (what is essentially)
>BCNF fragments. It simply is laborious for designers and programmers.

I could see a true column store having much better performance than
tricking a row based system into it. Just think of the per-row overhead we
currently have at 28 bytes per row. Breaking up data manually like that
may help a little, but if you don't have a very wide table to begin with,
it could turn out you save next to nothing by doing so. A column store
wouldn't have this issue, and could potentially have much better
performance.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-04-26 02:22:57 Re: Clarify "allow_system_table_mods"
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2016-04-26 01:24:36 Re: Clarify "allow_system_table_mods"