Re: Using CTE vs temporary tables

From: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3(at)gmail(dot)com>, hmidi slim <hmidi(dot)slim2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using CTE vs temporary tables
Date: 2018-07-11 16:59:42
Message-ID: CAMjNa7dH=Wg1t0JdxMU=OZetZ_Dm0sRrY9rxMbuMcQ7mKpsxEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

One thing to note, if this is a query you would like to run on a replica,
temp tables are a non-starter.

I really wish that wasn't the case. I have quite a few analytical queries I
had to optimize with temp tables and indexes, and I really wish I could run
on my hot standby.

I in most cases I can't refactor them to use a CTE for performance reasons.

Anyways, my 2¢.
- Adam

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igal @ Lucee.org 2018-07-11 17:36:49 How to tell which event was fired in Trigger function
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2018-07-11 16:41:09 Re: Using CTE vs temporary tables