Re: OT hardware recommend

From: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OT hardware recommend
Date: 2016-06-18 20:25:32
Message-ID: CAMjNa7cQc9odHhgJ=R4a=DK7VETrpUGpyTO=2Ns9pqF8cY2Gfw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Agreed with Joshua, a single ssd will have way more performance than all 15
of those for random io for sure, and probably be very close on sequential.
That said, a raid controller able to handle all 15 drives (or multiple that
handle a subset of the drives) is likely to be more expensive than a single
good ssd, or a couple / few pretty good ssd's.

It's really amazing how much solid state drives transferred the database
bottleneck away from disk.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Sofen 2016-06-18 21:06:28 Re: OT hardware recommend
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-06-18 19:15:40 Re: OT hardware recommend