From: | Cory Nemelka <cnemelka(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Writing WAL files |
Date: | 2020-10-10 14:21:02 |
Message-ID: | CAMe5Gn2QsBEUGApoOJOQpE1zc1KTyoKPe_JFBEX-UMnZn9sD2Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 3:41 AM Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> wrote:
> On 2020-10-05 11:29:04 -0600, Michael Lewis wrote:
> >
> > I suggest that in PG12 you can monitor the
> > "lag" of a standby server more directly by looking at columns
> > write_lag,
> > flush_lag, replay_lag in the pg_stat_replication view.
> >
> >
> > And are those things updated when there are no changes to the master
> > database?
>
> Probably not, as there is nothing to replicate, so no new data it
> provided.
>
>
> > If you setup a scripted process to update a single row with a
> timestamptz on
> > the source/primary every minute, then you have a very simple consistent
> change
> > and also a way to check on the replica what is current time vs
> > last_scripted_update_time if you will and know the approx lag. It would
> seem
> > like a simple albeit hacky solution to you wanting a file every X minutes
> > regardless of server activity.
>
> It also has the advantage that you don't have to wait for the WAL file
> to be written. You can just check whether the change appears on the
> replicas. About 2 years ago I wrote a Nagios/Icinga check that does
> that: Update a timestamp in a table on the master, then connect to all
> the replicas and wait for the change to show up on them. It then reports
> the lag for each replica and a final status (OK, WARNING, CRITICAL)
> based on the maximal lag.
>
> I think I wrote it because the PostgreSQL version we were using at the
> time didn't have the lag columns yet, but it does have the advantage of
> providing an end to end check (do I really get the correct value?), not
> the database's idea of whether replication is working.
>
> (The check is written in Go and buried in a svn repo at work, but I
> could publish it if there is interest)
>
> hp
>
> --
> _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
> |_|_) | |
> | | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
> __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
>
I would be interested in the Nagios/Icinga check you wrote.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Olivier Leprêtre | 2020-10-10 15:59:11 | Strange behavior |
Previous Message | Hemil Ruparel | 2020-10-10 12:25:52 | Re: How to migrate column type from uuid to serial |