From: | Mauricio Fernandez <mmauricio(dot)fernandez(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gabriel Guillem Barceló Soteras <gbarcelo(at)parlamentib(dot)es> |
Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: High Availability |
Date: | 2025-01-23 19:01:14 |
Message-ID: | CAMdfv4U3B0h01Ru_o_V2tQ_N3D8xVVabT+wYVDw0hN+tN+TYmA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thank you ver much for answering Gabriel
Kind regards
MF
El jue, 23 ene 2025 a las 10:15, Gabriel Guillem Barceló Soteras (<
gbarcelo(at)parlamentib(dot)es>) escribió:
> I think there is no gold-standard HA solution. Some commercial PostgreSQL
> offer HA as an add-on or standalone product, and they tackle different
> SPOFs with varying components. If you got the open source way, a good
> starting point is
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/high-availability.html
>
>
>
> Depending on your requirements you may go one route or another. For
> exemple, it may be ok for you a single pgpool-2 instance, without front
> Haproxy tier.
>
>
>
> We tested some of them, and we don’t use any of them so far. In our
> scenario we can assume some out of office downtime for maintenance tasks.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> *From: *Mauricio Fernandez <mmauricio(dot)fernandez(at)gmail(dot)com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 23 January 2025 at 02:20
> *To: *Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
> *Subject: *High Availability
>
> Hi admins, I need to know if anybody know about some survey, poll, web
> site, etc talking about most popular postgresql's most popular high
> availability solutions.
>
>
>
> Using repmgrd, with or without pgpool-ii, haproxy, etc.., commercial or
> free.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Mauricio Fernández
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wong, Kam Fook (TR Technology) | 2025-01-23 19:16:05 | RE: [EXT] Re: Sequence Cycle question |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-01-23 18:58:53 | Re: Sequence Cycle question |