From: | Volkan Unsal <spocksplanet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication connection from host |
Date: | 2015-04-09 19:03:47 |
Message-ID: | CAMcqKmkdAAoE7PpP__C1b365g0q0Zg+Eq-UVHxPTG55SGPEeJg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Melvin,
0.0.0.0 has the specific meaning "unspecified". So you really should
> enter the specific ip address for the slave in the master pg_hba.conf.
>
I tried this, but I am getting this error when I do that:
FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication connection from host
"104.131.66.183", user "rep", SSL off
DETAIL: Could not resolve client IP address to a host name: Name or
service not known.
Is ${REP_USER} defined on BOTH master & slave?
> IS ${REP_USER} defined as a valid user that can login in the database?
Yes, the variables are defined in the environment for both master and
slave. These variables are passed through a preprocessor and replaced with
their actual values. But the REP_USER only exists in the master database.
--
*Volkan Unsal*
*web and mobile development*
volkanunsal.com <http://bit.ly/1h1ebjy>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Volkan Unsal | 2015-04-09 19:05:03 | Re: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication connection from host |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-04-09 18:20:35 | Re: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication connection from host |