Re: Materialized View Patch File

From: Neel Patel <neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dave(dot)page(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Materialized View Patch File
Date: 2013-07-19 09:14:27
Message-ID: CAMcbDBFy7nv3u4f_dADX28b28VUHbdyLxKkAs_Pg82mQzqsgZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Thanks Dave.

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Dave Page <dave(dot)page(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>wrote:

> Thanks, patch applied.
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Neel Patel <neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Thanks for the comment.
> >
> > We made the changes as you suggested.
> >
> > Please find the updated patch in attachment and let me know if you have
> any
> > query.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Neel Patel
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Dave Page <dave(dot)page(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I realised this code is all wonky anyway - why is IsMaterializedView()
> >> not just an accessor over a pgView private variable that is set in
> >> pgViewFactory::CreateObjects when we create the object? We already
> >> know at that point whether it's a matview or not (from
> >> pg_class.relkind). Querying pg_class every time we want to check if
> >> the view is materialized or not is horribly inefficient. There should
> >> be just one function, that is a member of pgView and takes no
> >> arguments. Whereever it's called, we just need to get the pgView
> >> object and call it.
> >>
> >> Please fix.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Neel Patel <
> neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Dave,
> >> >
> >> > Please find the updated patch with modification in query.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Neel Patel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Dave Page <
> dave(dot)page(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Neel Patel
> >> >> <neel(dot)patel(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Dave,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Just want to know.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Now we are passing GetName() to qtDbString() and to form the
> complete
> >> >> > query
> >> >> > we need to use qtDbString() to compare the string.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We have added below string.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > wxString sql = wxT("SELECT count(*) FROM pg_matviews WHERE
> >> >> > matviewname =
> >> >> > ")
> >> >> > + qtDbString(this->GetName()) + wxT(" AND schemaname = ") +
> >> >> > qtDbString(this->GetSchema()->GetName());
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Is it correct ?
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd expect you to be using GetQuotedIdentifier() there. For a view
> and
> >> >> schema, the identifier is the name anyway.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Dave Page
> >> >> Chief Architect, Tools & Installers
> >> >> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >> >>
> >> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Page
> >> Chief Architect, Tools & Installers
> >> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >>
> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Chief Architect, Tools & Installers
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard PALO 2013-07-19 12:29:12 RTI patch using $(MAKE) instead of 'make' for SPHINX_BUILD
Previous Message Dave Page 2013-07-19 09:13:39 Re: Materialized View Patch File