From: | Calvin Dodge <caldodge(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert DiFalco <robert(dot)difalco(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Create one query out of two |
Date: | 2013-08-18 00:31:48 |
Message-ID: | CAMcRarZ1wtnib6YxR+kL1wnZb_CQnwMOW_eoVbpo2s6+yxrEog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
What does EXPLAIN show?
What proportion of contacts have owner_id=7 and user_id is null?
If it's a large number of contacts, I'd try the following:
create temporary table tusers as
select coalesce(p.ref_contact_id,e.ref_contact_id) as id, u.id as user_id
from my_users u
left join phone_number p on on p.significant=u.phone_significant
left join email_addresses e on e.email=u.email
where p.ref_contact_id is not null or e.ref_contact_id is not null;
create unique index tusers_idx on tusers(id);
update contacts set user_id=t.user_id
from tusers t
where t.id=contacts.id and contacts.owner=7 and contacts.user_id is null;
If it's a small number of contacts, then it might be worth creating a
temporary table of that subset, indexing it, then replacing "where
p.ref_contact_id is not null or e.ref_contact_id is not null" with "where
p.ref_contact_id in (select id from TEMPTABLE) or e.ref_contact_id in
(select id from TEMPTABLE)"
Calvin Dodge
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Robert DiFalco <robert(dot)difalco(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> Currently I run two queries back-to-back to correlate users with contacts.
>
> UPDATE contacts SET user_id = u.id
> FROM my_users u
> JOIN phone_numbers pn ON u.phone_significant = pn.significant
> WHERE contacts.owner_id = 7 AND contacts.user_id IS NULL AND
> contacts.id = pn.ref_contact_id;
>
> UPDATE contacts SET user_id = u.id
> FROM my_users u
> JOIN email_addresses em ON u.email = em.email
> WHERE contacts.owner_id = 7 AND contacts.user_id IS NULL AND
> contacts.id = em.ref_contact_id;
>
> For some reason I cannot figure out how to combine these into one update
> query. They are running slower than I'd like them to even though I have
> indices on user_id, owner_id, email, and significant. So I'd like to try
> them in a single query to see if that helps.
>
> As always, thanks for your sage advice.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-08-18 20:23:41 | Re: Create one query out of two |
Previous Message | Robert DiFalco | 2013-08-17 20:19:10 | Create one query out of two |