Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements
Date: 2023-06-28 03:22:55
Message-ID: CAMbWs4_ZFNUw59JhAnKUm+SLtaBvJ3FicLQKg0YXJ2mWGH2hGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:53 AM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Hi, hackers
>
> There has $subject that introduced by commit 6b4d23feef6. When we reset
> the entries
> if all parameters are avaiable, non-top-level entries removed first, then
> top-level
> entries.

I did not see the diffs. Maybe uploaded the wrong attachment?

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2023-06-28 04:15:47 Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements
Previous Message vignesh C 2023-06-28 03:16:48 Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication