On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 5:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmm, maybe we can additionally check if the PHV needs to be evaluated
> > above the join. If so it cannot be removed.
> Yeah, that seems to make sense, and it squares with the existing
> comment saying that PHVs used above the join can't be removed.
> Pushed that way.
Thanks for pushing it! I've closed the open item for it.
Thanks
Richard