Re: Some comments that should've covered MERGE

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some comments that should've covered MERGE
Date: 2022-10-25 02:15:18
Message-ID: CAMbWs4_--0QyTEXU=So7s5fQHsofvya2LcyNjp4+dH-td3KJxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:59 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:

> On 2022-Oct-19, Richard Guo wrote:
>
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > I happened to notice $subject. Attach a trivial patch for that.
>
> Thanks, applied. I did change the comment atop setTargetTable, which I
> thought could use a little bit more detail on what is happening, and
> also in its callsite in transformMergeStmt.

Thanks for the fix!

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2022-10-25 02:48:00 Re: fixing typo in comment for restriction_is_or_clause
Previous Message Richard Guo 2022-10-25 02:13:44 Re: Question about savepoint level?