Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 7:15 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 20:12, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > The v4 patch looks good to me (maybe some cosmetic tweaks are still
> > needed for the comments). I think it's now 'Ready for Committer'.
>
> I agree. I went and hit the comments with a large hammer and while
> there also adjusted the regression tests. I didn't think having "t" as
> a table name was a good idea as it seems like a name with a high risk
> of conflicting with a concurrently running test. Also, there didn't
> seem to be much need to insert data into that table as the tests
> didn't query any of it.
>
> The only other small tweak I made was to not call list_copy_head()
> when the list does not need to be shortened. It's likely not that
> important, but if the majority of cases are not partial matches, then
> we'd otherwise be needlessly making copies of the list.
>
> I pushed the adjusted patch.

The adjustments improve the patch a lot. Thanks for adjusting and
pushing the patch.

Thanks
Richard