Re: Wrong results with grouping sets

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong results with grouping sets
Date: 2024-09-10 04:04:17
Message-ID: CAMbWs49kAf7NQvndwBLcKGkq-g+a_r_iQUj2dynw-TC++DBUzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:16 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm seeking the possibility to push 0001 and 0002 sometime this month.
> Please let me know if anyone thinks this is unreasonable.
>
> For 0003, it might be extended to remove all no-op PHVs except those
> that are serving to isolate subexpressions, not only the PHVs used to
> carry the nullingrel bit that represents the grouping step. There is
> a separate thread for it [1].

I went ahead and pushed 0001 and 0002, and am now waiting for the
upcoming bug reports.

Thanks for all the discussions and reviews.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-09-10 04:06:21 Re: change "attnum <=0" to "attnum <0" for better reflect system attribute
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-09-10 04:04:00 Re: Use streaming read API in ANALYZE