Re: Wrong results with grouping sets

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong results with grouping sets
Date: 2024-09-10 04:04:17
Message-ID: CAMbWs49kAf7NQvndwBLcKGkq-g+a_r_iQUj2dynw-TC++DBUzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:16 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm seeking the possibility to push 0001 and 0002 sometime this month.
> Please let me know if anyone thinks this is unreasonable.
>
> For 0003, it might be extended to remove all no-op PHVs except those
> that are serving to isolate subexpressions, not only the PHVs used to
> carry the nullingrel bit that represents the grouping step. There is
> a separate thread for it [1].

I went ahead and pushed 0001 and 0002, and am now waiting for the
upcoming bug reports.

Thanks for all the discussions and reviews.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-09-10 04:06:21 Re: change "attnum <=0" to "attnum <0" for better reflect system attribute
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-09-10 04:04:00 Re: Use streaming read API in ANALYZE