Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test
Date: 2024-04-30 00:43:32
Message-ID: CAMbWs49fDjt-ArsTdYL9NCEPUdscvmiUEtBHC2hAknjfOeyiJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 9:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I noticed that some TAP tests from recovery and subscription would
> > select the count from pg_prepared_xacts. I wonder if these tests would
> > be affected if there are any prepared transactions on the backend.
>
> TAP tests shouldn't be at risk, because there is no "make
> installcheck" equivalent for them. Each TAP test creates its own
> database instance (or maybe several), so that instance won't have
> anything else going on.

Thank you for the explanation. I wasn't aware of this before.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2024-04-30 00:45:43 jsonpath Time and Timestamp Special Cases
Previous Message Dmitry Koval 2024-04-30 00:10:47 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands