Re: Apply the "LIMIT 1" optimization to partial DISTINCT

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Apply the "LIMIT 1" optimization to partial DISTINCT
Date: 2024-01-31 07:12:26
Message-ID: CAMbWs49VLFhWcx7i2L2XPypDD=BmTiPZvYe+SxAvyg+gVGQ4wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:26 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 21:14, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > However, having said that. Parallel plans are often picked when there
> > is some highly selective qual as parallel_tuple_cost has to be applied
> > to fewer tuples for such plans, so probably this is worth doing.
>
> I was messing around with your test case and didn't manage to get any
> plan that had any rows to use the partial path with the LIMIT. I
> ended up dropping the test that was checking the results were empty as
> I didn't think it added much more value over the EXPLAIN output.
>
> I pushed the result.

Thanks for pushing it!

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-01-31 07:23:19 RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Richard Guo 2024-01-31 07:11:16 Re: Some revises in adding sorting path