Re: A wrong comment about search_indexed_tlist_for_var

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A wrong comment about search_indexed_tlist_for_var
Date: 2024-05-16 09:58:32
Message-ID: CAMbWs49Pj3GO4Cth5cgZnWb0BqO8FfZn_nW6nJrSz1_7Ay2R=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:07 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:42 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Then here is a trivial patch to adjust the comment, which should get
> > reverted along with 867be9c07.
>
> Richard, since you're a committer now, maybe you'd like to commit
> this. I don't really understand the portion of your commit message
> inside the parentheses and would suggest that you just delete that,
> but the rest seems fine.
>
> If you do commit it, also update the status at
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4683/

Thank you for the suggestion. Yeah, this is a good candidate for my
first commit. :-) I will aim to do it during the next commitfest.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Quan Zongliang 2024-05-16 10:01:21 Re: Fix log_line_prefix to display the transaction id (%x) for statements not in a transaction block
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-05-16 09:49:24 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes