From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Joe Wildish <joe(at)lateraljoin(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MERGE bug report |
Date: | 2022-04-11 04:25:28 |
Message-ID: | CAMbWs494uDUNLURxWKA78GaY2MWiKpwo7eHDdmekAje3D=Xc0A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 5:26 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 2022-Apr-06, Richard Guo wrote:
>
> > That's right. The varattno is set to zero for whole-row Var. And in this
> > case these whole-row Vars are not included in the targetlist.
> >
> > Attached is an attempt for the fix.
>
> Wow, this is very interesting. I was surprised that this patch was
> necessary at all -- I mean, if wholerow refs don't work, then why do
> references to any other columns work? The answer is that parse_merge.c
> is already setting up the subplan's targetlist by expanding all vars of
> the source relation. I then remembered than in Simon's (or Pavan's)
> original coding, parse_merge.c had a hack to include a var with the
> source's wholerow in that targetlist, which I had later removed ...
>
At first I was wondering whether we need to also include vars used in
each action's targetlist, just as what we did for each action's qual.
Then later I realized parse_merge.c already did that. But now it looks
much better to process them two in preprocess_targetlist.
>
> I eventually realized that there's no need for parse_merge.c to expand
> the source rel at all, and indeed it's wasteful: we can just let
> preprocess_targetlist include the vars that are referenced by either
> quals or each action's targetlist instead. That led me to the attached
> patch, which is not commit-quality yet but it should show what I have in
> mind.
>
This patch looks in a good shape to me.
A minor comment is that we can use list_concat_copy(list1, list2)
instead of list_concat(list_copy(list1), list2) for better efficiency.
Thanks
Richard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-04-11 04:29:55 | Re: API stability |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-04-11 04:12:31 | Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby |