Re: boolin comment not moved when code was refactored

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: boolin comment not moved when code was refactored
Date: 2023-10-19 02:57:57
Message-ID: CAMbWs48sLt_fwpBri5o7g_oPgZiCAFnCLdZMu7t8gcRV=irY-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:35 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> I happened upon a function comment referring to non-existent code
> (that code was moved to another location many years ago).
>
> Probably better to move that comment too. Thoughts?

Agreed. +1 to move that comment.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2023-10-19 03:02:00 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2023-10-19 02:57:08 Re: Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends.