| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pg18 Recursive Crash |
| Date: | 2024-12-19 00:11:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs48mAZZKW_pHoVZsFfHr_69G=3Vm934p227XpdxNaM0arQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:45 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 at 22:29, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Should we be concerned about passing a NULL TupleTableSlotOps in
> > nodeRecursiveUnion.c?
>
> I made it pass NULL on purpose because the slot type on the recursive
> union can be different on the inner and outer sides. Do you see issues
> with that?
I see. I didn't notice any real issues with that; I was just flagged
by the XXX comment there, which raises the question of whether it's
worth working harder to determine the inputOps.
Thanks
Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-12-19 00:13:27 | Re: Pg18 Recursive Crash |
| Previous Message | Anton A. Melnikov | 2024-12-19 00:10:30 | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? |