Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test
Date: 2024-04-30 00:54:47
Message-ID: CAMbWs48adH1Am=tszAqyq3UtEhDCsFL22U8Jzq0EpPAA6tOd9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:43 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> I'd be curious about any discussion involving the structure of the
> meson tests.

+1. I'm kind of worried that the expansion of parallelization could
lead to more instances of instability. Alexander mentioned one such
case at [1]. I haven't looked into it though.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cbf0156f-5aa1-91db-5802-82435dda03e6%40gmail.com

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-04-30 01:48:13 Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2024-04-30 00:45:43 jsonpath Time and Timestamp Special Cases