Re: Assert failure in base_yyparse

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 7:12 PM Евгений Горбанев <gorbanyoves(at)basealt(dot)ru> wrote:
> If you replace is_not_null with NOT NULL in the query, everything works
> correctly.
> It seems that is_not_null is an incorrect keyword and it should not be
> used, but I don't understand how it gets here.

It seems what happens is that internally in gram.y (~line 14274), the
DefElem for the not-null option is assigned the name "is_not_null".
As a result, this allows users to explicitly use "is_not_null" as the
option name. However, the value provided for the is_not_null option
in this way might not be a Boolean as expected, which triggers the
assertion.

I kind of doubt we should allow the use of the "is_not_null" keyword
in the xmltable function.

Hi Álvaro, what do you think about this?

Thanks
Richard