Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash
Date: 2024-01-17 09:50:16
Message-ID: CAMbWs48UM6-Q0Aovh9Z8R1v2QvnRiJfjyRLMY+fqnVZEQMuW2w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:01 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:30 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:32 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>
> > Fair point. I think we can back-patch a more minimal fix, as Tom
>> > proposed in [1], which disallows the reparameterization if the path
>> > contains sampling info that references the outer rel. But I think we
>> > need also to disallow the reparameterization of a path if it contains
>> > restriction clauses that reference the outer rel, as such paths have
>> > been found to cause incorrect results, or planning errors as in [2].
>>
>> Do you want to produce a patch for that, to go along with this patch for
>> master?
>
>
> Sure, here it is:
> v10-0001-Avoid-reparameterizing-Paths-when-it-s-not-suitable.patch
>

I forgot to mention that this patch applies on v16 not master.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-01-17 09:50:59 Re: Add pgindent test to check if codebase is correctly formatted
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-01-17 09:38:45 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby