Re: Inconsistent results from seqscan and gist indexscan

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent results from seqscan and gist indexscan
Date: 2021-11-27 02:19:32
Message-ID: CAMbWs48OFYLUES7610Dhs9voctrR7rrdijfsiTFtiKgWh6=0uQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 5:23 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 2:10 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Seems point_inside() does not handle NaN properly.
>
> This is unfortunately a known issue, which was reported twice ([1] and
> [2]) already. There's a patch proposed for it:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/2710/ (adding Horiguchi-san in
> Cc).
>

Ah, I missed the previous threads. Good to know there is a patch fixing
it.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-27 02:30:13 Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-11-27 01:55:17 Re: pgsql: xlog.c: Remove global variables ReadRecPtr and EndRecPtr.