Re: Virtual generated columns

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Virtual generated columns
Date: 2025-02-18 10:09:17
Message-ID: CAMbWs4-JmGEBDucPw8iJ3H8hg-7TkbOqE0WTVzhJ5iyzQyP=-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 9:37 PM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 10:59, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> > Maybe a short-term fix would be to error out if we find ourselves about
> > to expand a Var with varnullingrels != NULL. That would mean you
> > couldn't use a virtual generated column on the nullable output side of
> > an outer join, which is annoying but not fatal, and we could fix it
> > incrementally later.
>
> I think that would be rather a sad limitation to have. It would be
> nice to have this fully working for the next release.

Besides being a limitation, this approach doesn't address all the
issues with incorrect results. In some cases, PHVs are needed to
isolate subexpressions, even when varnullingrels != NULL. As an
example, please consider

create table t (a int primary key, b int generated always as (10 + 10));
insert into t values (1);
insert into t values (2);

# select a, b from t group by grouping sets (a, b) having b = 20;
a | b
---+----
2 |
1 |
| 20
(3 rows)

This result set is incorrect. The first two rows, where b is NULL,
should not be included in the result set.

> Attached is a rough patch that moves the expansion of virtual
> generated columns to the planner. It needs a lot more testing (and
> some regression tests), but it does seem to fix all the issues
> mentioned in this thread.

Yeah, I believe this is the right way to go: virtual generated columns
should be expanded in the planner, rather than in the rewriter.

It seems to me that, for a relation in the rangetable that has virtual
generated columns, we can consider it a subquery to some extent. For
instance, suppose we have a query:

select ... from ... join t on ...;

and suppose t.b is a virtual generated column. We can consider this
query as:

select ... from ... join (select a, expr() as b from t) as t on ...;

In this sense, I'm wondering if we can leverage the
pullup_replace_vars architecture to expand the virtual generated
columns. I believe this would help avoid a lot of duplicate code with
pullup_replace_vars_callback.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2025-02-18 10:29:43 Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2025-02-18 09:55:54 RE: Restrict copying of invalidated replication slots