From: | Paul Hughes <paul(at)vivation(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2017-05-09 00:45:53 |
Message-ID: | CAMaVp2t0O77CqaPrGG4T2+19Yw6wuYTJDw=ZgBS8et0Zm6Ec6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you for the links. I'm glad there are other languages that are
working with PostgreSQL. My question still remains though - why is it that
all the largest web platforms that have used PostgreSQL *specifically*
choose Python as their back-end language? Why are Postgres and Python so
married, in the same way that Node.js is largely married to MondogDB?
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 02:26 PM, Paul Hughes wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed that most of the largest web platforms that use PostgreSQL as
>> their primary database, also use Python as their primary back-end
>> language. Yet, according to every benchmark I could find over the last
>> couple of years, back-end languages like PHP, HHVM, and Node.JS
>> outperform Python by 2x to 8x!
>>
>
> Postgres does not really care what you use to pull data from it. There are
> many libraries across many languages that you can use.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2017-05-09 01:22:09 | Re: Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2017-05-08 22:56:34 | Re: [plncek2@gmail.com: Can I safe my Data?] |