Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid

From: Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid
Date: 2018-03-22 21:24:13
Message-ID: CAMa1XUj=3gL2+yDRzUJQbcGgsNTTk9=8ZibRwe28Ub23KoJ8aw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thank you for the recommendation. I ran both amcheck functions on all 4
> > indexes of those 2 tables with heapallindexed = true, but no issues were
> > found.
>
> Probably wouldn't hurt to run it against all indexes, if you can make
> time for that. If you can generalize from the example query that calls
> the bt_index_check() function, but set
> "heapallindexed=>i.indisprimary" and remove "n.nspname =
> 'pg_catalog'", as well as "LIMIT 10". This will test tables and
> indexes from all schemas, which might be interesting.
> --
> Peter Geoghegan
>

I am running this on a san snapshot of our production system. I assume
that this will give me a valid check for file-system-level corruption. I
am going to kick it off and see if I find anything interesting.

Thanks,
Jeremy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alessandro Aste 2018-03-22 22:29:05 Re: Postgresql 10.3 , query never completes if LIMIT clause is specified and paralle processing is on
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-03-22 20:20:24 Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-22 21:38:53 Re: Error detail/hint style fixup
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-22 20:53:53 Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes